All About Content

Typo-Squatting Comes with Money-Back Guarantee

Posted by Melanie Phung on Sunday, April 30, 2006 at 11:59 am

An article in today’s Washington Post business section, titled The Web’s Million-Dollar Typos, highlights the practice of domain parking by people counting on Internet users misspelling their destination URL. This tactic is known as typo squatting and can be a very lucrative business, because according to industry analysts approximately 15% of all web traffic comes from people typing a domain into the address bar — as opposed to search or bookmarks.

The Business of Typo-Squatting
Simply buy an unregistered domain that is similar in spelling of a major brand, put some Google AdSense or Yahoo ads on it, and share in all that “contextual” advertising revenue. This works because most web users will click on the ads to get to their intended destination, rather than retype the domain or do a search to locate the correct URL.

And there is very low risk for the ambitious typo-squatting entrepreneur, as the Washington Post explains:

Because purchasers can change their minds within five days and avoid paying the $6 registration fee for the name, many investors enter the names in Google’s ad program for a quick test and quickly drop those that don’t yield enough clicks to cover the domain registration fee.

But others, including those who speculate on potential traffic of a specific domain name, argue that the pages are helping people find information related to what they’re looking for. Typo-squatters and those who provide services to support them claim these pages benefit the customer by making unused pages “function as alternatives to search engines.”

The Losers and Winners
This is a huge problem for those of us who participate in paid search. Every one of those clicks costs the advertiser money. For small business owners who pay a couple of cents per click, as well as for larger businesses bidding one or two dollars for competitive brand terms, that adds up quickly. Basically you are forced to pay money for clicks you are almost guaranteed to get for free in organic search (a search on your brand name).

Result: higher ad budgets (and lower ROI) and brand dilution.

As search professionals, I suppose, we could try to educate consumers about this type of web spam, but there’s no incentive for them to refrain from clicking on those ads. After all, one click gets them where they wanted to go.

It works for the consumer, and it works for the search engine since they (as the owners of the ad network) get a cut of that ad spend. Because Google and Yahoo benefit from the advertising revenue there is a disincentive to pull the plug on this practice across the board. Even when they don their “what’s in the best interest of the user” hats, removing these pages is still not a pressing issue. Sure, they clutter up the Internet with low-quality content, but like I said before, the argument would go, if someone mistypes a URL and then is presented with a link to the site they actually wanted to get to… well, isn’t that better than just landing on a 404 error page?

But as the recent click fraud lawsuits against Yahoo and Google show, publishers are starting to get fed up with those companies turning a blind eye to practices that benefit the search engines at the expense of advertisers. It would be wise for owners of ad publishing networks, especially ones focused just on parked domains, to try to reestablish the goodwill of legitimate content publishers and help unclutter the World Wide Web by cracking down on typo-squatting. Not because it’s in their immediate financial interest, but because it’s the right thing to do.

Comments Off on Typo-Squatting Comes with Money-Back Guarantee

Category: Contextual Ads,Monetizing,Navel-Gazing,Spam

You Can Hide from Googlebot…

Posted by Melanie Phung on Sunday, April 30, 2006 at 12:24 am

… but you can’t hide from Google’s bots. Google has confirmed that it’s using multiple spiders to feed crawl results into Bigdaddy. Specifically mentioned is that the AdSense mediapartners bot (a.k.a. mediabot) is caching pages for the natural search index.

Jenstar points out:

It could definitely be used as a tool to detect when content is being cloaked for either the Google or AdSense bot, particularly since the mediapartners bot has been indexing pages since at least the beginning of February.

Who knows how many other-named spiders Google has doing recon like this. Definitely would make the old IP cloaking black hat trick a little trickier.

More info on the crawl caching proxy on Matt Cutts’s site.

Comments Off on You Can Hide from Googlebot…

Category: Cloaking,Googlebot

State of the Blogosphere: Q1 2006

Posted by Melanie Phung on Saturday, April 29, 2006 at 3:14 pm

Dave Sifry’s overview of the world of blogs includes the astounding estimate that the number of blogs has doubled nearly every 6 months for the last 3 years, meaning the Blogosphere is 60 times bigger than it was in the spring of 2003. The current growth rate is one new blog per second, with 55% (19.4 million) of those blogs having a lifespan of more than 3 months.

Sifry’s next “State of the Blogosphere” post promises to talk about the tagging phenomenon. Given how large the blog world has grown, one would really expect it to somewhat spontaneously organize itself somehow. Tagging, of course, is one way to organize content – by topic. And I suppose awards like The Webbies pull together the highest quality sites from a range of categories, at least at the elite level — you’ll be able to peruse the latest crop of Webby Award winners when they are announced May 9 — but that’s not really self-organization.

Since I don’t believe I blogged about some of the new features Technorati released a while back, this would be a good time to point out that you can sort your Technorati searches by levels of “authority.” Your blogs authority is measured by…. you guessed it: how many other posts link to yours.

Think of it like the New York Times Best Sellers List. The more attention you get, the more attention people think you deserve.

(One day soon there will also be the equivalent of an Oprah’s Book Club for blogs … a way to make blogs even more accessible to those who like their hands held through their media consumption.)

Comments Off on State of the Blogosphere: Q1 2006

Category: Blogging,Data

An Unhealthy Fascination With

Posted by Melanie Phung on Friday, April 28, 2006 at 8:32 pm

Haven’t had a lot of time to update the blog in a while, but I am still keeping my SprayOnSalt page up to date with search engine news I find worth reading. This list of links also appears in the navigation column of the blog’s homepage.

Other things that might be worth an update: I’m still fascinated by that issue I was having with pages getting first page rankings for what seemed like not entirely un-competitive words. Basically these pages were getting ranked based on off-page factors (i.e., inbound links) and possibly the URL (file name). But file names are not believed to be hugely important relative to the most focused-on factors like title tags, on-page copy, links, etc.

That leaves links. While there is a lot of cross-linking inside, all the pages use the “nofollow” robots meta tag, as well as “noindex” — so the only links that should be counting are external links, with the pages not getting any boost in link popularity from internal links. Given that it seems unlikely that many people would link to a tag page inside, those few links must be pretty valuable. (A quick search using the “link:” operator confirms there aren’t many links coming in.)

That’s my hypothesis. So I’m playing around to see if I can significantly manipulate the ranking of these “URL only” listings by just pointing a couple of links to them (for example, to a page like but using entirely irrelevant anchor text. So far I’ve only tried it with pages that are already ranking, but early indication is that those links move up in the results based on only a couple of IBLs.

I’m also creating new tags that don’t exist yet to see if I can get a new tag page ranking out of nothing. Shouldn’t be hard, because if people aren’t already tagging a word or phrase, it probably isn’t a very competitive one… like, say, oh…

So that’s one of the things I’m playing around with. Will post an update if I turn anything up.

Comments Off on An Unhealthy Fascination With

Category: Uncategorized

comScore Releases March Market Share Stats

Posted by Melanie Phung on Wednesday, April 19, 2006 at 7:08 am

comScore’s latest release shows that the number of search queries rose and, once again, Google not only leads the pack but takes market share from its competitors.

Other highlights:

  • Americans conducted 6.4 billion searches online in March, up 10% from last month and 15% from last year. The increase in search queries from the previous month marked the largest gain over the past 12 months.
  • Google Sites led the pack with 2.7 billion search queries performed, followed by Yahoo Sites (1.8 billion), MSN-Microsoft (849 million), Time-Warner Network (486 million), and Ask Jeeves/Ask Network (376 million).
  • The toolbar search market continues to be dominated by Google and Yahoo, which combined for more than 95% of toolbar searches in March. Google led the way with 48.9%, while Yahoo captured 46.5%.

Comments Off on comScore Releases March Market Share Stats

Category: Data,Google,Yahoo